Thursday, May 04, 2006

Demonizing Russia

I couldn't help but post this comment made by Patrick Armstrong, analyst for the Canadian government, from Untimely Thoughts (Peter Lavelle's project).

There's always a standing bill of indictment against Russia, although the details continually change. In 2001 the Washington Post warned that Russia would default on debt repayments; the Kursk sinking prompted reflections on the "callous disregard for human life" of Russia's leadership (Knight 2000); in 1997 Kissinger was complaining about Russia's "refusal" to demarcate its borders; no Russian leader had ever left power voluntarily and neither would Yeltsin, warned Stephen Cohen in 1994. Most charges prove ephemeral or false - nuclear tests in Nova Zemlya, the Security Council as the "new Politburo", war over the Black Sea Fleet - but others come up again and again. Some charges have validity. The war in Chechnya was certainly very brutal. Putin has centralized power and tightened control over the media. But, when these charges appear on the bill of indictment, they appear without context. The Russian army is brutal in Chechnya not necessarily because it wants to be, but because bad armies are brutal. And, despite "fabricated rumors of a Chechen-al Qaeda nexus" (Washington Times, 2002), we know better. Nor do we hear as much about "unresolved" (Guardian, 2000) apartment bombings when there have been so many jihadist bombings of nightclubs, railway stations, tourist resorts and mosques. Putin is centralising because he (and, be it clear, most Russians) agree that the 1990s were frighteningly chaotic. A centralised media is not desirable but neither was the media of the oligarch wars. Too many governors were the pawns of local hoods. Putin does have reasons, good or bad, for what he does: saying "tight-lipped 47-year-old KGB staffer" (Guardian, 2000) or "Andropov redux" (Gaffney, 2000) is not an explanation. When Brzezinski last year stormed that Moscow refused to repudiate the Hitler-Stalin pact, it wasn't just "nostalgic efforts by Vladimir Putin to restore Moscow's control": no country will assume responsibility for historical malfeasance when it knows the next step will be reparations claims.

While charging Putin with bringing back the "Soviet anthem" (Wall Street Journal, 2000), the fact that all the other state symbols were lifted straight from the Tsars was not mentioned. This is not argument, it is advocacy. The essence of the charge sheet style is that the conclusion determines the evidence. Take the everlasting assertion that Russia is naturally imperialist: this is the oldest of the charges - experts "knew" that Gorbachev would never leave Germany - and as time moves on, the accusation remains. The format is the same: Russia's so-called nostalgia for empire is asserted (Jonathon Eyal in 1993, Pipes in 1994 and 1998, George Tenet in 1997, Paul Goble 2000) and examples are filled in as needed: "democratic Georgia" today, the Baltics yesterday, Germany the day before. As the troops leave one country, another place is found to prove the point. The "energy weapon" is deployed against contumacious neighbors like Ukraine (but be careful not to mention that Gazprom is raising the price for "friends" like Armenia and Belarus, too). The charge predates Putin ЁC in 1993 The Economist decided that Georgia's independence had been already snuffed out and the energy wars have been going on since 1991.

Rarely, however, is it pointed out that Russia's neighbors are more independent each year and that Russian troops are leaving them too. Or that while Ukraine needs Russian energy, Russia needs Ukrainian pipelines to move its gas to those who actually pay for it. The boot here is actually on both feet. "Imperialist Russia", it is clear, is a premise, not a conclusion. The repetitive bills of indictment have a cumulative effect - people forget the alarums that never came to pass but remember the underlying message that Russia is a menace. Why try to take an objective look at the whole of Russian reality when "traditional Russian imperialism" (Kissinger, 1997) is all you need to know? A great deal of opinion in the USA and the West has been shaped by the continual drum roll of warnings, accusations and indictments. Eventually the message gets stuck in: Russia is an enemy.

Putin hires a Western PR company to help improving Russia's image in the world. Absolutely hopeless. I think it's better to forget about "image problems" and go our own way. Собака лает - караван идет.

11 comments:

Lyndon said...

The "sobaka laet" chestnut was employed to best effect, in my memory at any rate, by the late, great Aleksandr Lebed'. I've always found it interesting to imagine what a Lebed' presidency might have looked like, but I think it might not have lived up to my expectations.

Getting more on topic, it's true that the US has a whole cohort of professional Sovietologists, some of whom have been unable or unwilling to break out of their 1980's mode of analysis. I think it is fair to point out that Russia also has a generation of foreign relations professionals who grew up regarding the US with hostility, and I think it's been easy for people in Russia inside and outside of the policy elite to fall back into this comfortable mindset.

The US and Russia both have "image problems," as does, for example, China, and in every one of these cases the "image problems" reflect legitimate flaws and criticisms, at least to a certain extent - does this mean that each of these large countries, whose spheres of interest (territorial, economic, security, etc.) cannot help but bump into each other in today's world should just "go its own way"? At some point the caravans will collide.

Anyway, Putin or whoever he's got managing the media can't seem to do without the West - an external "enemy" is required for domestic consumption, and sadly foreign NGO's seem to be it.

Thomas Wicker said...

Lyndon said many of the things I was thinking upon reading the piece -- namely, that image problems abound around nations (he picked two great ones with the US and China).

Two other points:
1) For every "image problem issue," and expert who says, "Oh, [fill-in-the-blank] is the end of the world!", there's another expert who disagrees. That's what experts do. Cheney's speech was considered remarkable (in the US) not because it was seen as being accurate -- but because it was the highest-level expression of the viewpoint and considered to be a setback for Russian "expert" Condi Rice, who's much less negative about what Russia is doing. In fact, a good bit of the analysis of Cheney's speech isn't that Russia is evil as a result, but that, in addition to an attack on Rice's position, it's also a salvo in gas wars.

2) I think Lyndon's comparisons are interesting for a second point -- and that is that, with all major powers, you're going to have people who don't like you. That's life. Sure, you try to put facts in the media (which, I think, is all Putin's doing with getting a PR firm), and you recognize that you can't shut yourself off from the world (Russia's foreign account surplus comes, by definition, from trade with foreign sources -- otherwise it wouldn't be a "foreign" account surplus). That said, you'll have pot-shots taken at you.

Now, admittedly, Russia does have another option, and Konstantin expressed it. You can shut off the rest of the world and pretend it doesn't exist. Just stop trade and become an ignored backwater. After all, when was the last time you heard of any news from Tuvalu?

On the other hand, if Russia wants to be the power it can be, then, well, it gets the full package.

Those of us from the US and China simply say, "Oh, you're getting disparaged? Welcome to the club."

-- twicker

(fyi, I'm posting this from the lobby of the Intourist Hotel in Krasnodar -- and, frankly, I think you need to start fixing your image problems at home before you worry about the ones abroad. Things ain't so bad -- but, whenever anything isn't quite perfect, I commonly hear people say, "Welcome to Russia" as a way of explaining it. Whereas, even though not everything in America is perfect, you wouldn't hear Americans saying, "Welcome to America" as a way of explaining the breakdown. I doubt you'd hear it from the Chinese, too.)

Anonymous said...

Do want to know the magic of online games, and here you can get more mabinogi gold. Do you want to have a try? Come on and cheap mabinogi can make you happy.You can change a lot mabinogi money for play games. And you can practice your game skill. Playing online games can buy mabinogi gold. I often come here and buy it. And you can use the mabinogi online gold do what you want to do in the online game.

What do you know maple mesos. And do you want to know? You can get mesos here. And welcome to view our website, here you can play games, and you will get cheap mesos to play game. I know maplestory mesos, and it is very interesting.Do you want a try, come and view our website, and you will learn much about maple story mesos. Come and join with us. We are waiting for your coming.

Anonymous said...

aion chinaaion china gold,
aion cn goldaion chinese gold,
aion gold chinaaion gold chinese,
china aion goldchinese aion gold,
aion china kinaaion chinese kina,
aion kina chinachina aion kina,
aion china buybuy aion china,
aion chinese server

gold
aion cn server

gold
,
aion china server goldchina aion server gold,
chinese aion server

gold
aion chinese server

gold
,
aion cn server kinaaion china server kina,
china aion server kinachinese aion server kina

BUY WOW GOLD said...

wow very nice blog!

Adi said...

Oes Tsetnoc one of the ways in which we can learn seo besides Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa. By participating in the Oes Tsetnoc or Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa we can improve our seo skills. To find more information about Oest Tsetnoc please visit my Oes Tsetnoc pages. And to find more information about Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa please visit my Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa pages. Thank you So much.

GiGi said...

Your blog is very good, it's the best blog I've ever seen, thank you!
By the way, do you like polo shirts, which are very chic, especially the polo t shirts, I love them very much. I also like playing tennis rackets, it can keep healthy, what do you like to do? I'd like to introduce myself as the outlet of polo t shirts women, polo t shirts on sale, and polo t shirts for women. These products are our masterpieces, such as polo shirts on sale, polo shirts men, men's polo shirt, men polo shirt, mens polo shirts, mens polo shirt, besides we also sell cheap polo shirts, discount polo shirts, men's polo shirts, women's polo shirts. We are also the outlet of, cheap tennis racket, discount tennis racket, we recommend prince tennis racquet, head tennis rackets, wilson tennis racket, babolat tennis racquet. And it is our great pleasure that you come to our store online!

buy wow gold said...

Very good blog

WoW Oro said...

Great post

bike arenal said...

Costa rica tours, shopping online, costa rica fishing, jaco fishing charters, costa rica whale watching, costa rica dolphin watching, costa rica party boat, panama fishing, fishing costa rica los suenos, los suenos fishing charters, costa rica fishing los suenos, los suenos costa rica fishing, costa rica los suenos fishing, fishing costa rica los suenos, los suenos fishing charters, costa rica fishing los suenos, los suenos costa rica fishing charters, costa rica los suenos fishing, Los suenos fishing, Fishing costa rica los suenos, Costa Rica Rafting,
http://www.kingtours.com/.

dfadf said...

The Tax Return Crack-Up<2>
I was not shocked because this was old news -- practically ancient, in fact. In R. Microsoft Office Emmett Tyrrell, Office 2010 Jr.'s most recent book The Clinton Microsoft Office 2010 Crack-
Up, page fiv Office 2007 e, paragraph two, we learn that in Bill Clinton's "first four years out of the White H Microsoft Office 2007 ouse, he ea Office 2010 key rned over Office 2010 download $43 million Office 2010 Professional after
expenses... Microsoft outlook "
The next Outlook 2010 page directs Windows 7 us to Appendix Microsoft outlook 2010 I, a list of the conniving couple's fees for speeches and book royalties and other income. The first